• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

For a majority of students enrolled at IGNOU, the review of literature can be the most confusing aspect of the work. This is especially the case for those working on the ignou master's degree project in which academic depth is expected. However, the direction often feels limited. Students usually inquire if they require a summation of their books, write journal articles in a different way, or simply take notes of quotations. The truth lies somewhere between, and knowing that a distinction could alter the quality of the entire project.

Literature reviews are not meant to display the quantity of information you've read. It's written to demonstrate how well you understand the previous work that pertains to your topic and how your research fits into it. IGNOU assessors scrutinize this chapter since it showcases your ability to link knowledge with research directions.

Understanding the Purpose of Review of Literature

Before completing any work, it is essential to know why this chapter is necessary in an ignou MCOM project. The literature review serves three principal purposes.

It first shows that the area you've selected has been studied earlier and has academic significance. Furthermore, it will help you discover gaps or issues in prior research. The third is that it creates an outline for your research goals and the methodology.

Many students approach this chapter as a formality and copy content from their previous projects or online sources. This approach usually results in very low marks or projects being rejected. IGNOU does not require original writing when examining existing studies.

What IGNOU Expects in Literature Review

IGNOU doesn't expect students to write on the scale of a PhD thesis. Additionally explaining in the simplest way is discouraged. In an ignou project, the review of literature must reflect understanding at postgraduate level.

It is expected that you read books, research papers journals, reports or even publications from the government that relate to the subject you are researching. The study should focus on topics closely related to the area of your study.

In this case, for example, if your task is to study the financial performance of banks the literature review should be focused on previous studies that dealt with financial ratios, financial performance, profitability analysis, and risk assessment.

Selecting Relevant Literature Sources

A common mistake that students make is choosing too many different sources. Quality is more important than quantity. For a project involving ignou mcom about fifteen to twenty high-quality sources are often enough as long as they're carefully chosen.

Some good sources are academic journals well-known books written by renowned author, RBI documents, Government reports and even university research papers. Websites that don't have a clear authorship must be avoided.

Always opt for recent studies especially those from the past 10 years. Studies from the past can be considered only if the studies are fundamental in nature.

Organizing the Review of Literature Chapter

A well-organized section improves reading comprehension and creates a positive impression. Instead of composing random summaries, you can divide each literature overview into logical sections.

You can arrange the chapter according to themes, time period, methodology, or variables investigated. For instance, one chapter may examine studies that pertain to profits, whereas another may focus on liquidity while the other regarding operational efficiency.

This structure aids evaluators in understanding the difference between copying content, but actually analyzing it.

Writing Style for IGNOU Literature Review

The style of writing is academic, but simple. Avoid overly complicated language and terms. IGNOU believes in simplicity over complexity.

Each research study you write about should include the author's name, year of study, research objectives, methods, and main findings. Don't mention them in a formal manner. Try connecting one study with a different one.

When you've discussed your findings from one study, highlight how another author's study supported or disputed those findings. This type of analysis adds richness to your ignou project.

Avoiding Common Writing Mistakes

The most common error is writing the literature review as the kind of chapter in a textbook. A brief explanation of the most fundamental concepts, like the definition of accounting or the meaning of management is not a good idea here unless directly linked in previous studies.

Another error is over-quoting. Your review of literature should be written in your own words. Reading from the source shows understanding, and copying shows dependency.

They are also often unable to link books to their own research field. Every study you reference must be in line with your objectives for your project.

Links Literature Review with Research Gap

One of the most significant results of the review of literature is identifying the gap in research. IGNOU assessors require you to explain what the previous researchers missed and where further research is needed.

In a discussion of multiple studies you will notice that the majority of studies focused on large corporations as small businesses were left out. It is also possible that previous studies used secondary data, whereas primary data was not enough.

This gap serves as the rationale for your Ingou MCOM project. Without it, your project will seem repetitive.

Use of Citations and Referencing

When writing a review of literature it is important to use a proper citation. IGNOU generally recognizes APA style, but quality is more important than consistency.

Each study covered must appear in the list of references at the end of the project. Any missing references cast doubt on the authenticity.

Avoid footnotes on literature reviews. In-text citations are more efficient and appears cleaner in an ignou MCOM project.

Length of Review of Literature Chapter

Students frequently ask what the length of the literature review should run. There's no set timeframe in the case of an ignou MCOM project, the length of this chapter typically runs from fifteen hundred and two thousand words.

The length of the discussion should be based on topic complexity. The more expansive topic requires the most research, whereas a concentrated topic will require less but more in-depth discussions.

Writing lengthy reviews that are not needed without analysis does not improve marks.

Example of Literature Review Writing Approach

Instead of writing like this
Author A looked into banking performance and found good results

Write it like this
An author conducted a research study on banking performance with financial ratios. He found that profitability improved because of better asset management. This conclusion was later confirmed by Author B who highlighted the importance of operational efficiency in improving bank profitability.

This type of approach shows the ability to analyze and comprehend, which is valued in an IGNOU MCOM project topics (my latest blog post) mcom project.

Maintaining Originality and Academic Integrity

IGNOU takes plagiarism seriously. Many projects are delayed or rejected due to plagiarism in literature reviews. Even if you refer to previous studies, the language will have to match your own.

Use plagiarism detection tools if possible, and modify content to make it sound natural. A sentence that is slightly flawed can be better than perfect copied.

Final Review Before Submission

Before submitting your ignou-mcom task, revisit the review carefully. Examine whether every study is relevant, whether the flow is consistent, and whether it is linked naturally to your research objectives.

Ask yourself one simple question. Does this chapter explain the reason for why I need to study it. If the answer is yes that literature study is in the right path.

Closing Thoughts

Writing a review of literature for an ignou-mcom project is not easy at first particularly for students who are returning to college after a long absence. If you can realize that it's about analysis and connection rather than recitation, the challenge is a lot easier.

It is important to take time to read, consider, and write in your personal voice. This effort will be evident on the final piece and often determines the difference between an average project and a high-quality one.