• 목록
• 답변
• 글쓰기
• 게시판 리스트 옵션
  • 수정
  • 삭제

A growing number of creatives are hesitant about using AI-edited images in their work. They fear that the results might seem fabricated, compromise realism, or even misrepresent their brand. These concerns are well-founded and deserve attention.

AI-powered photo editors have advanced quickly, but they are still imperfect. Some images still show subtle glitches, odd lighting, or artificial surfaces that sharp observers can identify.

However, the key is not to reject AI outright but to use it responsibly. The optimal solution blends machine speed with human oversight. A trained visual artist can audit AI-generated edits, apply precise tweaks, and ensure the final image matches the brand’s voice.

This collaborative process preserves the credibility of the visual content while reducing turnaround and optimizing budgets. Consumers and viewers are increasingly aware with visual retouching, and as long as the end result feels truthful and polished, the vast majority won’t notice—or won’t be bothered—the use of AI.

Transparency also helps. If a company opting to share that AI was used in image editing, click here it often fosters loyalty rather than undermines it. Ultimately, AI should be seen as a resource that elevates creatives, not replaces them. When used thoughtfully, it strengthens rather than undermines professionalism.

The real aim isn’t to create perfect synthetic visuals but to share messages authentically, honestly, and effectively.